🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.